In the 2026-2027 policy debate topic, “Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States,” debaters are able to delve into the affordability crisis in America. The topic is small, yet vibrant, and there is certainly key arguments to…
General policy debates in the status quo center around a utilitarian framework, maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However, NSDA takes a different approach with a large pool of lay judges, creating the soft-left affirmative strategy.
Ever since Donald Trump was sworn into the Oval Office, he has made dramatic shifts in U.S. posture towards the arctic. As he has taken multiple executive actions, the arctic’s geopolitics and regional development have adapted alongside them.
Trump’s threats of tariffs on European nations over Greenland have intensified tensions, prompting strong reactions from European leaders and a potential EU counter-strategy involving substantial tariffs.
On Sunday, President Trump told reporters on Air Force One, “We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security.” Leaders of the EU and NATO remain extremely cautious of a potential US takeover of Greenland.
President Trump has said that if he fails to take Greenland “the easy way,” then he will take it “the hard way.” This continued geopolitical uncertainty has multiple implications for arguments regarding the policy topic.
Bryan Gu explains the history of kritiks and analyzes their impact on policy debate today.